Appeal Application details for - CAS-03509-W9S0C4
- Location
- Land at Penrhiw Bungalow, The Downs, St. Nicholas, CF5 6SB
- Proposal
- Without planning permission, the carrying out of operational development comprising the construction of a two-storey flat roof front extension and first floor flat roof front extension to the property.
- Easting
- -
- Northing
- -
- Type
- Enforcement appeal
- Enforcement Ref
- ENF/2023/0282/CLL
- Related Planning Ref
- -
- Appeal Method
- WR
- Committee Date
- 25/04/2024
- Committee/Delegated
- Committee
- PI Decision Date
- -
- PINS Reference
- CAS-03509-W9S0C4
- Appellant
- Mr Lawrence Gainey
- Agent
- Mr Andrew Ayles
- Appellant Address
- C/O Agent.
- Agent Address
- AJ Planning Office 14 35 Stow Park Circle Newport NP20 4HF
- Parish
- St. Georges & Brides Community Council
- Ext Inspector
- -
- Ward
- Peterston-super-Ely
- Appeal Officer
- Marc Stephens
- Decision
- -
- Decision Date
- -
- In Abeyance
- -
- Source of Decision
- -
Costs Awarded
- Application Made By
- Council
- -
- Appellant
- -
- Costs Awarded To
- Council
- - -
- Appellant
- - -
| Name | Date Sent | ExpiryDate |
|---|---|---|
| Peterston Super Ely Ward1 | 24/07/2024 | 26/08/2024 |
| St Georges & St Brides-Super-Ely Community Council | 24/07/2024 | 26/08/2024 |
| Address | Response Count |
|---|---|
| Barclays Bank UK PLC (Co. Regn. No. 9740322), of P.O. Box 187, Leeds, LS11 1AN. | 1 |
| - | 3 |
| Downsend The Downs St Nicholas Vale of Glamorgan CF5 6SB | 2 |
| File name | Created date | |
|---|---|---|
| Appeal Documents | ||
| Delivered_ Appeal Questionnaire CAS-03509-W9S0C4_ Land at Penrhiw Bungalow_ The Downs_ St_ Nich | 29/07/2024 | |
- Appeal Start
- 22/07/2024
- Questionaire Sent
- 29/07/2024
- Questionaire Due
- 29/07/2024
- Statement Sent
- 15/08/2024
- Statement Due
- 19/08/2024
- Proofs Sent
- -
- Proofs Due
- -
- Inquiry / Hearing
- -
- Old Inquiry / Hearing
- -
- Venue
- -
- Available From
- -
- Site visit
- -
- Duration
- -
Grounds and Decisions
LBC ENF Appeals Only
- A
-
Y
- - B
-
-
- - C
-
-
- - D
-
-
- - E
-
-
- - F
-
Y
- - G
-
Y
-
- H
-
-
- - I
-
-
- - J
-
Y
- - K
-
Y
-
- Variations to Notice
- -
- Enforcement Notice Reasons
- The development has been undertaken to a residential property sited in the countryside, between two neighbouring properties. New development should respond appropriately to the context and character of the original dwelling as well as the surrounding environs. New development should also be designed to safeguard the residential amenity of neighbouring properties. By virtue of the approximately 6.4m height, increased depth, and boxed form of the two storey and first floor front extensions, the massing towards the front of the dwellinghouse has significantly increased. As a result, the extensions to the front of the dwellinghouse are considered disproportionate in scale and do not respond appropriately to the context or character of the original dormer bungalow or the site surroundings. Consequently, the extensions as built are considered to have had an unacceptable visual impact and fail to accord with Polices MD2 and MD12 of the Adopted LDP, as well as the Residential and Householder Development SPG (2018). It is also considered that the increased height and depth of the two-storey front extension on the east side of the house has resulted in an unacceptable loss of outlook and light, as well as having an overbearing impact on the adjoining neighbour to the east, Downsend. Therefore, the extensions as built have failed to safeguard the residential amenity of the occupiers of the adjoining property to the east, contrary to criterion 8 of Policy MD2 of the LDP.
- Ground Letter Text
- Ground (a) That planning permission should be granted. Ground (f) The steps required to comply with the requirements of the Notice are excessive Ground (g) That the time given to comply with the Notice is too short
- Fee payable
- Y
- Fee Due
- 460.00
- Fee Due By
- -
- Fee Paid
- Y